But both are updatable false and insertable false?

I might be daft, but that doesn't look good to me...

Cheers
Viktor

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Charles F. Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> In my Lift app based on the JPA demo I tried this, which should work
> beautifully according to everything I've been able to get my hands on:
>
> @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
> @Column{val name="CREATED_AT", val updatable = false,
>   val insertable = false}
>
> @org.hibernate.annotations.Generated(org.hibernate.annotations.GenerationTime.INSERT)
> var createdAt : Date = new Date()
>
> @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
> @Column{val name="UPDATED_AT", val updatable = false,
>   val insertable = false}
>
> @org.hibernate.annotations.Generated(org.hibernate.annotations.GenerationTime.ALWAYS)
>   var updatedAt : Date = new Date()
>
> This should, if I'm right, set an immutable created_at timestamp and a
> mutable updated_at timestamp upon insert, and update the updated_at
> timestamp upon each update.
>
> What it actually does is leave both fields null. What a drag.
>
> Any ideas? Is this a Scala thing? Am I missing something really obvious,
> as usual?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chas.
>
> >
>


-- 
Viktor Klang
Senior Systems Analyst

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to