Hey Derek,

Whats @PrePersist - cant say im that familiar with it?

Cheers

Tim

On Oct 24, 4:10 pm, "Derek Chen-Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I use the @PrePersist lifecycle method interceptor when I want to
> do things like record dates. Not quite as concise as the Hibernate stuff,
> but it's more flexible since you control the logic for what gets
> set/updated.
>
> Derek
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think you should be able to do this by using an interceptor or event
> > listener - does this article help:
>
> >http://java.dzone.com/articles/using-a-hibernate-interceptor-
>
> > If you manage to get the created_on and updated_at stuff working I'd
> > be interested in how you did it as I think its something we should be
> > using.
>
> > Cheers
>
> > Tim
>
> > On Oct 22, 9:38 am, "Viktor Klang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > After migrating from Hibernate 3.0 to 3.3.1 the past 2 weeks I have
> > gained
> > > some hatred towards Hibernate.
>
> > > I had to write atleast 3 workarounds to Hibernate bugs. No cool at all.
> > :/
>
> > > I feel your pain,
>
> > > cheers,
> > > Viktor
>
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Charles F. Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > Nope. Turns out this is a really poorly explained "feature" of
> > Hibernate
> > > >  (and, in the opinion of many, a really dumb one). My code was correct,
> > > > and the problem isn't anything Scala-related. In order for this code to
> > > > work, the *database* has to generate the values, e.g. via a trigger,
> > > > which I, the designer, have to add.
>
> > > > Sheesh. The whole point of Hibernate, I thought, was that I don't have
> > > > to deal with the database end. Why this can't just add the triggers for
> > > > me is beyond me. It's easier just to set them in the application, I
> > think.
>
> > > > Thanks for the help. Live and learn, I guess.
>
> > > > Chas.
>
> > > > Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
> > > > > Yeah, I think you want insertable to be true on the first one (just
> > omit
> > > > > the insertable val) and on the second one you want to omit both
> > > > > insertable and updatable to make them both true.
>
> > > > > Derek
>
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Viktor Klang <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> > > > >     But both are updatable false and insertable false?
>
> > > > >     I might be daft, but that doesn't look good to me...
>
> > > > >     Cheers
> > > > >     Viktor
>
> > > > >     On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Charles F. Munat <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> > > > >         In my Lift app based on the JPA demo I tried this, which
> > should
> > > > work
> > > > >         beautifully according to everything I've been able to get my
> > > > >         hands on:
>
> > > > >         @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
> > > > >         @Column{val name="CREATED_AT", val updatable = false,
> > > > >           val insertable = false}
>
> > @org.hibernate.annotations.Generated(org.hibernate.annotations.GenerationTi
> > me.INSERT)
> > > > >         var createdAt : Date = new Date()
>
> > > > >         @Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
> > > > >         @Column{val name="UPDATED_AT", val updatable = false,
> > > > >           val insertable = false}
>
> > @org.hibernate.annotations.Generated(org.hibernate.annotations.GenerationTi
> > me.ALWAYS)
> > > > >           var updatedAt : Date = new Date()
>
> > > > >         This should, if I'm right, set an immutable created_at
> > timestamp
> > > > >         and a
> > > > >         mutable updated_at timestamp upon insert, and update the
> > > > updated_at
> > > > >         timestamp upon each update.
>
> > > > >         What it actually does is leave both fields null. What a drag.
>
> > > > >         Any ideas? Is this a Scala thing? Am I missing something
> > really
> > > > >         obvious,
> > > > >         as usual?
>
> > > > >         Thanks,
>
> > > > >         Chas.
>
> > > > >     --
> > > > >     Viktor Klang
> > > > >     Senior Systems Analyst
>
> > > --
> > > Viktor Klang
> > > Senior Systems Analyst
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to