Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers! Sorry, couldn't resist
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One thing Id like to challenge the rational of within: > > > http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/master/lift/src/main/scala/net/liftweb/http/rest/XMLApiHelper.scala > > is line 70: > > def createTag(in: NodeSeq): Elem > > In your class that extends this trait, you implement this method > something like: > > def createTag(in: NodeSeq) = <badger>{in}</badger> > > Lets assume your api method returns a list of articles, the semtantic > IMO, should be: > > <articles> > <article> > ... > </article> > ... > </articles> > > But because of this createTag method, the tag being wrapped around the > body you get the badger tag wrapping a list of articles. From a > semantic POV, id say this is counter-intuitive. Badgers have no > bearing on articles! How could it be implemented so its possible to > define the root tag? > > Cheers > > Tim > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
