lol - dont be a Badger hater Derek! I only have beef with Badgers when there nodes wrap my articles in a needless and annoying fashion ;-)
On Nov 8, 7:28 pm, "Derek Chen-Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers! > > Sorry, couldn't resist > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One thing Id like to challenge the rational of within: > > >http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/master/lift/src/main/scala/net/lif... > > > is line 70: > > > def createTag(in: NodeSeq): Elem > > > In your class that extends this trait, you implement this method > > something like: > > > def createTag(in: NodeSeq) = <badger>{in}</badger> > > > Lets assume your api method returns a list of articles, the semtantic > > IMO, should be: > > > <articles> > > <article> > > ... > > </article> > > ... > > </articles> > > > But because of this createTag method, the tag being wrapped around the > > body you get the badger tag wrapping a list of articles. From a > > semantic POV, id say this is counter-intuitive. Badgers have no > > bearing on articles! How could it be implemented so its possible to > > define the root tag? > > > Cheers > > > Tim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
