wow this is super sweet marius! A couple of questions:
- net.liftweb.record.Test... shouldn't this be in the tests package? - DBRecord, whats the difference between this and ordinary record? Looking at the code, it appears that DBRecord just adds some abstract stuff like stubbs for save methods etc: if this is the case, and it could indeed apply for non-database backed things, then shouldnt it be called "Persistab leRecord" or something more abstract? The actual persistence mechanism would then be provided by the relevant trait inclusion Cheers Tim On Nov 15, 6:30 pm, Marius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I just committed in master the code for generic support for Record/ > Field. David will start adding JDBC spices soon. > > Perhaps there a a couple of more field "types" to add so please take a > look and let us know your thoughts. > > Br's, > Marius --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
