On Nov 16, 2:29 am, "Derek Chen-Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's funny, I just checked out the wip-record2-dpp branch this morning to
> start looking at it :) So far, I really like what I see. I would agree with
> Tim on calling it Persistable... vs DB... but otherwise it's looking very
> good. If I have some time this week I might start looking at how to meld
> this with JPA.
>
> One thing I've been thinking about is that I think there may be a little
> dissonance in lifecycle between what we do in JPA and what we'd do in JDBC.
> For instance, in JPA, entity state is managed by the provider; there's no
> need to explicitly save an object per se, because the provider will
> automatically detect changes to the managed instance and send those changes
> to the DB. That means that if you make a change and decide you don't want to
> save it then you need to explicitly *revert* the object or the changes will
> get pushed to the database at the end of the session. Off the top of my head
> I don't think this is going to be a huge issue but I'm going to have to go
> through it a few times from both angles (JPA style vs Mapper style) to make
> sure that I don't have any undefined or anti-defined behavior.
Good point, but to implement JPS you need to extend Record and not
DRecord. Record itself has no idea about save, delete etc. functions.
Wouldn't this suffice?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Derek
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Marius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All,
>
> > I just committed in master the code for generic support for Record/
> > Field. David will start adding JDBC spices soon.
>
> > Perhaps there a a couple of more field "types" to add so please take a
> > look and let us know your thoughts.
>
> > Br's,
> > Marius
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---