On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Derek Chen-Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I didn't realize someone else was writing one, Yep. Me. > but hey, the more the merrier :) Yep. I'm devoting December through March to the book and hope to have something complete and published by JavaOne. > > > Derek > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Oscar Picasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Two book? Wow! >> >> Any idea when they are expected? >> >> Oscar >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:51 PM, David Pollak < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM, tacobandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I noticed mvn pulled a new lift today and it seems it's still not >>>> working with scala 2.7.2? I'm not worried about it or anything just >>>> wondering if I'm doing something wrong since I think David Pollack >>>> remarked that once 2.7.2 final was released lift would be immediately >>>> updated... >>> >>> >>> >>> I didn't same "immediately", I said soon after. Upgrading any software >>> is a non-trivial task. >>> >>> There is a 2.7.2 branch of Lift. It's been maintained in parallel with >>> Scala's 2.7.2 development. >>> >>> Lift depends on more than just Scala... it also depends on Specs and >>> ScalaCheck. These packages were upgraded to Scala 2.7.2-final over the >>> weekend. Expect Lift to be updated to 2.7.2-final this week. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Also, I'm wondering if there's a master plan for documentation. I >>>> think that's a huge blocker for wide lift adoption. I mean not just >>>> the lack of hand-holding tutorial type stuff but even in the >>>> scaladocs... If they're anything like me, people pretty much have to >>>> look at the source code to learn how to use lift... fortunately the >>>> source is clear and easy to read so it's not so bad, and i'm happy >>>> with it... but I just have a curiosity if addressing the >>>> documentation issue is on the horizon? >>> >>> >>> There are two Lift books in the works. As part of the API clean-up >>> tasks, we're writing more ScalaDocs. It's a long process, but expect >>> reasonable documentation when Lift goes 1.0. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>> Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us >>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
