It's on github, I think:

git clone git://github.com/tjweir/liftbook.git

Chas.

Marius wrote:
> Tyler is there a way for me to sneaky see what you guys done so
> far? :)
> 
> Br's,
> Marius
> 
> On Nov 18, 2:50 am, TylerWeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Derek and I expect the first draft of ours in January 2009.
>>
>> On Nov 17, 7:01 pm, "Oscar Picasso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Two book? Wow!
>>> Any idea when they are expected?
>>> Oscar
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:51 PM, David Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM, tacobandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> I noticed mvn pulled a new lift today and it seems it's still not
>>>>> working with scala 2.7.2? I'm not worried about it or anything just
>>>>> wondering if I'm doing something wrong since I think David Pollack
>>>>> remarked that once 2.7.2 final was released lift would be immediately
>>>>> updated...
>>>> I didn't same "immediately", I said soon after.  Upgrading any software is
>>>> a non-trivial task.
>>>> There is a 2.7.2 branch of Lift.  It's been maintained in parallel with
>>>> Scala's 2.7.2 development.
>>>> Lift depends on more than just Scala... it also depends on Specs and
>>>> ScalaCheck.  These packages were upgraded to Scala 2.7.2-final over the
>>>> weekend.  Expect Lift to be updated to 2.7.2-final this week.
>>>>> Also, I'm wondering if there's a master plan for documentation. I
>>>>> think that's a huge blocker for wide lift adoption. I mean not just
>>>>> the lack of hand-holding tutorial type stuff but even in the
>>>>> scaladocs...  If they're anything like me, people pretty much have to
>>>>> look at the source code to learn how to use lift... fortunately the
>>>>> source is clear and easy to read so it's not so bad, and i'm happy
>>>>> with it...   but I just have a curiosity if addressing the
>>>>> documentation issue is on the horizon?
>>>> There are two Lift books in the works.  As part of the API clean-up tasks,
>>>> we're writing more ScalaDocs.  It's a long process, but expect reasonable
>>>> documentation when Lift goes 1.0.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> David
>>>> --
>>>> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
>>>> Collaborative Task Managementhttp://much4.us
>>>> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
>>>> Git some:http://github.com/dpp
> > 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to