> So if a general JPA integration proves to be hard then I see value in just > having seamless integration of JPA/hibernate with Lift features. And if > somebody wants to use other JPA-impl, they can always use it just the way > they can use it today.
This is a fairly good point - seamless integration is important, if thats what we support, more often than not people will go with what we support. Derek: as you are the JPA with Lift guru, what is your gut feel? If a compiler plugin yeilds a slicker implementation, but is a little more work, then we should go with that. However, if using the hibernate stuff yields a slick enough solution and doesn't give users ugly looking code, then sure, i think it could be an acceptable solution. Cheers, Tim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
