IMHO:
" @Column{val name = "my_name"}
var name : String = _
object nameField extends StringField(this,100) with Delegated
nameField.delegate(name, name = _)"
That's just too much boilerplate. For me, who went to scala to lose
boilerplate, this is not a viable solution.
Unfortunately the JPA spec is kind of weak when it comes to adaptation, so
my suggestion to make it work with Hibernate first still stands.
What do you guys think?
Cheers,
Viktor
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Derek Chen-Becker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> No big deal. In the example code I did a by-name in the delegate method so
> at least it's transparent to the end-user.
>
> Derek
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jorge Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to chime in real quick...
>>
>>
>>> type Getter = () => MyType // Can this be by-name in any way?
>>>
>>
>> No. By-names are not first-class types. It's gotta be () => MyType
>>
>> --j
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--
Viktor Klang
Senior Systems Analyst
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
