My standard procedure is to go into .netbeans and rename the directory for
my current version (I've been using the dev build, so it is called dev) so
that I have a backup and can revert.

I have found always starting with a clean directory is .netbeans is key.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, David Pollak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I'd suggest removing the ~/.netbeans directory (and anything that looks
> like it).
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Charles F. Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I thought I had updated to that, but maybe I broke it before the
>> update... Will install all the latest this time and will see what
>> happens. But I had the same experience a couple of months ago when I
>> tried it for the first time. I'd really like it to work, though. That
>> would be great, and it would be consistent with my Linux box.
>>
>> Chas.
>>
>> David Pollak wrote:
>> > There was a defect in the plugin.  Cauyuon posted a fix to this list
>> > last week.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Charles F. Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >     I've tried twice to get NetBeans up and running on my MacBook Pro
>> with 2
>> >     gigs of RAM. Both times I made the mistake of loading in the entire
>> >     liftweb library. After that -- and even after I closed the liftweb
>> >     master project -- NetBeans will lock up for long periods of time
>> (e.g.
>> >     ten minutes or more) every few keystrokes to do some sort of
>> indexing.
>> >     It is unbelievably frustrating. Closing and re-opening NetBeans,
>> >     rebooting the computer, etc. do nothing to help. As far as I can
>> tell,
>> >     once that happens, NetBeans is toast.
>> >
>> >     I plan to reinstall NetBeans (for the nth time) and *never* open
>> Lift in
>> >     it, but that sort of defeats the purpose a bit since perusing the
>> source
>> >     code is where it would be most useful. Maybe I need to set some
>> variable
>> >     differently? I tried enlarging the heap space and things just got
>> worse.
>> >
>> >     I don't seem to have a plethora of other choices.
>> >
>> >     Chas.
>> >
>> >     David Pollak wrote:
>> >      > Charles,
>> >      >
>> >      > I use NetBeans and a whole lot of printlns.  In general, if
>> >     you've got a
>> >      > case class or Scala collections, the toString methods are pretty
>> >      > descriptive of what's going on.
>> >      >
>> >      > I have heard tell that it's possible to hook the NetBeans
>> >     debugger up to
>> >      > a running Jetty instance and do breakpoints in the Scala code and
>> >      > inspect variables.  I have not tried it myself.
>> >      >
>> >      > Thanks,
>> >      >
>> >      > David
>> >      >
>> >      > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Charles F. Munat <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  >      > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      >     One of the hardest parts about learning Lift and Scala is not
>> >     really
>> >      >     know what objects look like. Things get pretty complicated
>> >     and it's
>> >      >     difficult to remember what's in what.
>> >      >
>> >      >     It would be very nice to be able to step through Lift and see
>> >     exactly
>> >      >     what is where in memory and how things change, etc. Normally,
>> >     I'd use an
>> >      >     IDE for this. I used to work in C#, and Visual Studio has
>> >     some very nice
>> >      >     tools. I can step through the program, look in any variable
>> >     to see
>> >      >     what's in it, etc.
>> >      >
>> >      >     In Ruby, I use TextMate. I'm not very good at it, so most of
>> my
>> >      >     techniques are more rudimentary. But Rails has a nice method
>> >     called
>> >      >     debug. I can spit out what's in a variable by just adding:
>> >      >
>> >      >     <%= debug @my_variable %>
>> >      >
>> >      >     to a template. Lift, however, eschews code in templates. I
>> >     created a
>> >      >     Test snippet to do the same thing, but I'm having trouble
>> >     understanding
>> >      >     reflection in Scala. In Ruby, object.inspect or
>> >     object.to_yaml can give
>> >      >     me a pretty good picture of the object.
>> >      >
>> >      >     I've tried Lift in Eclipse, NetBeans, and JEdit and none of
>> >     them seem to
>> >      >     work very well. Out of memory errors are common, or I just
>> >     can't seem to
>> >      >     get it set up properly.
>> >      >
>> >      >     What tricks are others using to make it easier to see what's
>> >     going on in
>> >      >     Lift? Is there a way to step through a request and see
>> >     exactly what
>> >      >     happens and in what order? I would kill for that ability.
>> >      >
>> >      >     Chas.
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      > --
>> >      > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
>> >      > Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
>> >      > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
>> >      > Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>> >      >
>> >      > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
>> > Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
>> > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
>> > Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>> >
>> > >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>
> >
>


-- 
http://erikengbrecht.blogspot.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to