Chas, You say you are trying both local installs, and pulling from the snapshot repo?
Can I suggest persisting with a single path at any one time? They are different and conflicting workflows really - unless your modifying the lift codebase to your own ends, Hudson will build the very latest JAR about an hour after the commit, so that should be more that acceptable time wise :-) Blow your .m2 away for now, and then decide on a workflow. A nice clean start! You should find that doing one or the other is a lot more consistant than doing both. Cheers, Tim Sent from my iPhone On 30 Dec 2008, at 00:34, "David Pollak" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Charles F. Munat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Any ideas what might cause a partial update rather than a full update? > Is it because I've only got the webkit in my pom.xml and not the other > parts of lift (I'm not using the mapper, e.g.)? > > It's working fine now, but I'd like to avoid this problem in the > future. > It seems to crop up with depressing regularity. Still not clear if I'm > doing something wrong or if this is just the current state of > git/maven/lift. > > Git and Maven are two very different things and have nothing to do > with each other. If you're getting messed up git pulls, that's a > really serious issue, but something way beyond this list. You > should take any failure Git updates to the GitHub or main Git lists. > > In terms of Maven, I don't know what to tell you. I run Maven and > about once a month or so, I blow away my repositories. Since I've > been periodically blowing about .m2, I haven't had a single Maven- > related problem. > > The only thing I can think of is that you should include both the > Lift Webkit and Lift Utils in your POM file. They are different > packages and perhaps Maven isn't updating them in sync... perhaps > Maven is pulling Lift Webkit when you do a -U, but not pulling the > Lift Utils package that the WebKit depends on. > > > > Thanks. > > Chas. > > David Pollak wrote: > > Sounds like you're getting a partial update. The code is clean on > all > > my machines which means it's clean in GitHub. > > > > If you're still having issues, please post up examples of > compilation > > failures. > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Charles F. Munat <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > When I do a git pull on the lift 0.10-SNAPSHOT (I think), I > get an > > interesting melange of Box and Can that does not compile. Am I > doing > > something wrong, or are there still some references that need > to be > > changed over? > > > > I'll keep trying. > > > > Chas. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > > Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us > > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
