That thought did come to me, but you are correct. I can see inconsistencies but don't know enough to be certain I wouldn't lead others astray. It is also possible work in progress that I am seeing mid-stream.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Charles F. Munat <[email protected]> wrote: > > You can actually update the wiki yourself, I think. It's probably faster > that writing about it to the list, unless you're not sure you're correct... > > Chas. > > James Matlik wrote: > > > > I have found another inconsistency on the wiki at > > http://wiki.liftweb.net/index.php?title=HowTo_run_examples. The wiki > > has several links for obtaining the version 1.0 example source code; > > however, only the links for downloading the WAR files work. All the > > other links for obtaining the sources are dead. The google code project > > doesn't even have a lift-1.0 tag in the subversion repository; lift-0.8 > > appears to be the most recent. How should code be pulled from svn? > > Should we use the lift-0.8 tag or pull from head? Or has the code moved > > to git, so the svn repository should be considered legacy? > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
