And if they're useful, can subclasses of MappedForeignKey define them more exactly?
Errors looked like this: [WARNING] C:\workspace\liftapp\src\main\scala\com\liftworkshop\model\ToDo.scala: 16: error: object creation impossible, since type ForeignType in trait MappedFor eignKey with bounds >: Nothing <: net.liftweb.mapper.KeyedMapper[Long,my.liftapp .model.User] is not defined [WARNING] object owner extends MappedLongForeignKey( this , User ) [WARNING] ^ [WARNING] C:\workspace\liftapp\src\main\scala\com\liftworkshop\model\ToDo.scala: 16: error: object creation impossible, since type FieldType in trait MappedForei gnKey with bounds >: Nothing <: Long is not defined [WARNING] object owner extends MappedLongForeignKey( this , User ) [WARNING] ^ --j On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jorge Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone know what these two types: > > type FieldType <: KeyType > type ForeignType <: KeyedMapper[KeyType, Other] > > in trait MappedForeignKey are doing? > > They're never fully defined and never used, but somehow were causing > compile problems in someone's code. > > If they're useless, can they be axed? > > --j > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
