Heh, heh. I built http://tridosha.com/ in 1999. It is still running pretty much unchanged. (Which is too bad, because significant amounts of data on the site are out of date. But it's built in Cold Fusion and I haven't the tools or the knowledge to work on it. And the owners are too poor, I guess, to hire a new developer.)
Still, ten years is pretty good. And it's not a bad looking site. Mesa looks very cool. I'm impressed. Too bad I don't have $34. Chas. David Pollak wrote: > I've got 8+ active projects that use Mapper. It will continue to be > supported for a *long time*. It will not be the recommended path after > 1.1, but given how long software <http://www.plsys.co.uk/mesa> I write > tends to stay in production <http://dogscape.com> , I think it's safe to > say that if you use Mapper today, you'll get at least 5 years of support > on it. > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > I have been looking through Lift documents trying to figure out what > to do about an ORM for my first Lift app. The migration from Mapper > to Record also adds uncertainty. I don't really want to commit to an > ORM that will be deprecated in 2 months. Is there somewhere I can > read about the design goals, migration path, and development status of > Record? > > > > > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
