I'm also using joda-time, and very pleased with it. In fact, I use it
in my Lift project - via JPA with the provided Hibernate extensions
for mapping of DateTime, Period, etc.

Kris

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:54 PM, TylerWeir <tyler.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For an internal project I used JodaTime, twas a dream.
>
> I have switched to using MappedLong along with Unix time for dates
> now.
>
> ( hooray for ancedotes! )
>
> On Mar 31, 3:21 pm, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.or...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was on IRC trying to help Clemens with this. The name (MappedDateTime),
>> targetSQLType (java.sql.Types.TIMESTAMP), and type (extends
>> MappedField[java.util.Date, _]) of this class suggests millisecond precision
>> (java.sql.Timestamp and java.util.Date have millisecond precision). However,
>> methods jdbcFriendly and real_convertToJDBCFriendly use java.sql.Date, which
>> has only day precision.
>>
>> If the intent is day precision, then calling the class DateTime is probably
>> misleading. If the intent is millisecond precision, then we have a bug.
>>
>> <rant>
>>
>> Which brings up the larger issue of the brokennes of the Java Date/Time API.
>> Java 7 will hopefully be getting a newer/better one, but for those of us
>> stuck on Java 5/6, Joda Time is much preferable to the native Date/Time API.
>> It more clearly represents foundational concepts like instants (March 31,
>> 2009 at 12:15.000pm UTC), partials (March 3 or 7:15pm), intervals (the space
>> between two instants), durations (1000 milliseconds), periods (1 month), and
>> chronologies (calendar systems). It's also completely immutable (oh, you
>> didn't know java.util.Calendar isn't thread-safe? you're lucky to have never
>> had to track down that bug).
>>
>> </rant>
>>
>> Sigh... it's probably too big of a breaking change to rip out Java Date/Time
>> from Mapper and Helpers and replace it with Joda Time, but one can dream...
>>
>> --j
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Clemens Oertel
>> <clemens.oer...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > While trying to figure out why my MappedDateTime fields get stored in
>> > the DB with all the time info set to 0, I noticed the following:
>>
>> > MappedDateTime (v. 1.0) "claims" to be a TimeStamp: def targetSQLType
>> > = Types.TIMESTAMP. However, it uses java.sql.Date for its JDBC-
>> > friendly converted version, not java.sql.TimeStamp. If I read the
>> > java.sql.Date documentation correctly, java.sql.Date does set all time
>> > information to 0, since the SQL DATE type only stores dates, by no
>> > times.
>>
>> > Any comment whether this might have something to do with me losing my
>> > time would be appreciated.
>>
>> > Best,
>> > Clemens
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to