No perf difference. The annotations are turned into the same exact closures.
2009/5/29 Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>:
>
>
> Are there any performance implications considering closures vs annotations?
> Agreed that closures are more "lift like" however.
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> On 29/05/2009 10:21, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I think that would be really good. But I'd rather not use annotations.
>> Personally I find closures approach a much better fit here.
>>
>> withTxRequired {
>> ... // do transational stuff
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> Br's,
>> Marius
>>
>> On May 29, 11:55 am, Jonas Bonér <jbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys.
>>>
>>> I have been talking with David Pollak the rest of the lift team about
>>> adding JTA to Lift. I have implemented that for a product written in
>>> Scala some time ago. Now some of that code is OSS
>>> at:http://github.com/jboner/skalman/tree
>>>
>>> We used using two different APIs.
>>> 1. Annotations (would require Lift to support proxied objects, e.g.
>>> grab them from a factory):
>>>
>>> @TransactionAttribute(REQUIRED)
>>> def transactionalMethod = { ... }
>>>
>>> 2. Call-by-name:
>>>
>>> withTxRequired {
>>> ... // do transational stuff
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> But I don't know what fits Lift and would like to know how you guys
>>> would like to have JTA integrated.
>>> At which level? Which APIs? Etc.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonas Bonér
>>>
>>> twitter: @jboner
>>> blog: http://jonasboner.com
>>> work: http://crisp.se
>>> work: http://scalablesolutions.se
>>> code: http://github.com/jboner
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> >
>
--
Jonas Bonér
twitter: @jboner
blog: http://jonasboner.com
work: http://crisp.se
work: http://scalablesolutions.se
code: http://github.com/jboner
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
