On 02/10/09 6:25 PM, David Pollak wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> <indraj...@gmail.com <mailto:indraj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 2, 5:39 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
> <mailto:feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> > <indraj...@gmail.com <mailto:indraj...@gmail.com>>wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Folks,
> >
> > > Following up from the previous round, I am summarizing what we
> > > discussed so far with an attempt to converge and move on to impl.
> > > Would be keen to have feedback and possibly arrive at some
> resolution
> > > on the outstanding items. (Meaty stuff below the module structure)
> >
> > > liftweb
> >
> > > - lift-core [H]
> > > - lift-base [J]
> > > - lift-util [J]
> > > - lift-actor
> > > - lift-json
> > > - lift-webkit [K]
> >
> > > - lift-persistence
> > > - lift-mapper
> > > - lift-record
> > > - lift-jpa
> >
> > > - lift-modules [L]
> > > - lift-testkit
> > > - lift-osgi
> > > - lift-wizard
> > > - lift-widgets
> > > - lift-machine
> > > - lift-textile
> > > - lift-facebook
> > > - lift-amqp
> > > - lift-xmpp
> > > - lift-openid
> > > - lift-oauth
> > > - lift-paypal
> > > - lift-jta
> >
> > > - lift-archetypes
> > > - ...
> >
> > > - lift-examples [M]
> > > - ...
> >
> > > - lift-site
> >
> > > - lift-resources [N]
> > > - lift-root-model
> > > - lift-site-skin
> > > - lift-installer
> > > - misc config resources (scaladoc, javadoc etc.)
> >
> > > Resolved since:
> >
> > > [A] lift-* prefix is fine/preferred for top level categories
> (dir_name
> > > == artifactId) [Heiko]
> >
> > > [B] For Lift users not using Maven these *-all.jars will be
> valuable.
> > > Assembly preferred to meta [Heiko]
> >
> > > [C] lift-testkit to move to lift-modules. Applications would use it
> > > under 'test' scope. [David]
> >
> > > [D] lift-json to be part of core [Marius]
> >
> > > [E] lift-persistence being separated from lift-core into it's own
> > > category and made optional [Marius]
> >
> > > [F] No deep nesting within modules (no submodules) for now [Heiko]
> >
> > > [G] Presentations and docs to be in central repository for now
> > > [+1:David/Tim/Derek, +0:Indrajit, -1:Heiko/Viktor].
> > > Settling for central repo at the moment (a: least change, b: in a
> > > hurry to converge, c: effect of living in largest democracy in the
> > > world!). Later on, I'll attempt to make this part of site
> build and
> > > make them more conveniently available.
> >
> > > Outstanding since:
> >
> > > [H] lift-core has to get a better and more appropriate name
> (and also
> > > to avoid confusion since lift-core == 'everything lift' at the
> > > moment).
> > > Starting with two that come to my mind.
> > > - lift-lite (Members of this category make up the lightweight,
> > > minimalistic Lift distribution that would help you build a Lift
> based
> > > application)
> > > - lift-genesis (Members of this category make up the genesis of
> > > your Lift based application)
> > > - lift-mini (Minimal Lift distribution to get started with Lift)
> > > - lift-minimal (Same as above)
> >
> > How about lift-web (the stuff you need to build a web application)
>
> Hmm, lift-web vs lift-web/lift-webkit could add to confusion. Too many
> combination of lift+web (liftweb.net <http://liftweb.net>, lift-web,
> lift-webkit) for
> comfort.
>
>
>
> okay.
Now that lift-base is free for grab, I am settling for lift-base for
lack of any other clear winner.
So we have lift-base = (lift-common, lift-util, lift-json, lift-actor,
lift-webkit)
Feel free to comment in favor or against (vote/veto) if someone has a
better option popping up.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > [J] lift-base, lift-util needs more unambiguous names.
> > > - lift-base -> lift-common [+1:Naftoli/Derek/Stuart/Marius/Tim/
> > > Heiko/Viktor, +0:Indrajit -1:DavidB (very strong)] But still
> good to
> > > have even better option.
> >
> > +1 for lift-common, but I'm not wedded to the name.
> >
> > > - lift-util -> lift-util (no change) [+1:Marius/David (status
> > > quo)]
> >
> > I'm going to mandate that this not change. The cost of changing
> is too high
> > and the value to changing is minimal.
> >
> > > - lift-util -> lift-webutil
> [+1:Naftoli/Derek/Stuart/Indrajit/Tim/
> > > Heiko/Viktor]
> >
> > Veto.
>
> Fair do. let's settle for lift-common and lift-util for now.
>
<snip/>
Cheers, Indrajit
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
