Sun doesn't bump the version unless they break backwards compatibility, which they have (mostly) never done since JVM 1.0. Those classfiles still run!
Heiko Seeberger wrote: > Hi, > > There has been a large amount of new stuff and also some breaking > changes since Lift 1.0. As an OSGi guy I suggest we call the next > version Lift 2.0, because increasing the major version number will > show the world that there are breaking changes and/or cool new > features. At least, this is how versions are used in OSGi land. OK, I > know that Sun follows another version strategy (keeping the major > version fixed to 1 forever) and the Scala folks also seem to be stick > to 2.x (quite a lot people would like 2.8 to be 3.0), but IMHO this is > no reason for Lift to follow the same mislead strategy. So what do you > think? > > Heiko > > My job: weiglewilczek.com <http://weiglewilczek.com> > My blog: heikoseeberger.name <http://heikoseeberger.name> > Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger <http://twitter.com/hseeberger> > OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org <http://scalamodules.org> > Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net > <http://liftweb.net> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > -- Eric Bowman Boboco Ltd [email protected] http://www.boboco.ie/ebowman/pubkey.pgp +35318394189/+353872801532 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=.
