Hi, I will look into adding Box support.
Cheers Joni On 19 marras, 21:24, David Pollak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Joni Freeman <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On 18 marras, 01:10, David Pollak <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I'd like to see the JSON stuff moved from Option to Box, but that's > > Joni's > > > call. > > > Hi, > > > I do not agree. We have quite a lot of lift-json users who do not yet > > use other parts of Lift, and Box is not a familiar construct outside > > of Lift. I really like to keep it that way. But could lift REST APIs > > wrap the lib to provide more Liftesque API? > > It's more of a return-type issue. > > The reason I created Box in the first place is that Option doesn't give you > the ability to capture reasons for None (yeah, there's Either... although > there wasn't when I introduced Box [Can at the time], but you can't use > Either in a for comprehension). > > In reviewing the JSON code, there's actually nothing that I'd change in the > APIs. I would support Box everywhere there's support for Option > (serializing/deserializing and implicit helpers). > > > > > > > Cheers Joni > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Lift" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=. > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=.
