Okay Folks,

Lift 2.0 branch has shaped up enough for everybody to play with.
Checkout the branch irc_wip_lift20 and get going! Just be aware that
it's still undergoing updated and changes incrementally and there are
few rough edges.

Key changes:

1. The project tree has been restructured according to the proposal
sent out earlier [1]. To summarize, we now have three top level
projects (framework, archetypes and examples) each with independent
build life-cycle. There are other additional infra projects that are
less to do with the actual code.

A quick summary of the top-level projects:

1. Framework:
The whole of Lift Framework that matter most to most. The usual
modules (viz., lift-base, lift-persistence and lift-modules) have got
nested within. Therefore, from now on, building Lift framework would
mean just that. Doing a "git pull" or "git clone" as usual, changing
to framework directory and running "mvn install".

2. Archetypes:
The standard distributed archetypes. The archetypes help you get quick
started with a Lift based project. If you are not into building maven
archetypes, you can stay clear of this. But a quick probe is welcome.

3. Examples:
All the Lift examples are grouped into this project. If you are
generally interested in learning different techniques from examples
you don't have to build the whole of Lift anymore. Well that was still
the case earlier, but now it's even more obvious. And it's true the
other way round too, if you have to build Lift framework from source,
you don't have to build the examples along with it. Another point: the
examples won't be deployed on scala-tools maven repo anymore. Those
war files up there serve no good purpose.

Everything now gets neatly tucked into their respective homes :)

Additional points that you should be aware of:

A. Availability on scala-tools repository:
- Components of framework would be available
- Components of archetypes would be available
- Components of examples would *not* be available

B. Availability on scala-tools Maven site:
Site generated from framework would be the main content of scala-tools
Maven site. Depending on how things go, we might even have a home of
it's own at http://dev.liftweb.net. (Separate proposal coming up)

C. Lift Parent Project Model:
The top level pom.xml has moved to it's own home at resources/project-
model. This would stay as a 'flyweight' project (as in boxing, not
GoF) on it's own that would strictly control the common behavior,
plugin dependencies, versions etc. for all the top level projects
(framework, archetypes, examples). This would be deployed on scala-
tools repository.

D. Lift Site Skin (WIP):
I haven't started working on this yet. But the intent is to create a
project site that is of some real value and serves as placeholder for
mostly 'auto-generated' docs. See #B above.

E. Still pending:
a. Migration to Scala 2.8 branch. Intend to have stable master created
first with everything working as usual without being caught into Scala
release cycle. Hopefully, this branch and '280_port' would merge soon!
b. Higher quality site generation (See #B above, proposal coming up)
c. Site skin (See #D above)
d. Hudson integration and better release management. So that certain
steps in Committer release process [2] become automatic (waiting for
merge to master and hudson maintenance)
e. Having a nice README.md at the top level
f. General spit and polish

F: To be decided:
a. Future of lift-core. (Separate mail coming)
b. Relevance of OtherLicensedWorks.txt (repo distribution of javamail
is now under CDDL and license automatically reflects in dependency
page)
c. Need for remove-trailings.sh (can be replaced by git pre-commit
hook)


[1] http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/450a3e741999b5df
[2] http://wiki.github.com/dpp/liftweb/committer-release-process

Feedbacks most welcome!

Cheers, Indrajit

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


Reply via email to