That's great that Lift2.0 is on Scala 2.8

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Eventually, yes, Lift 2.0 would be on Scala 2.8. But that's not the only
> difference between Lift 1.0 and Lift 2.0.
>
> To follow the context, you might want to take a look at this thread:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/479edef7700ccce6
> .
>
> Cheers, Indrajit
>
> On 21/12/09 8:22 AM, Xuefeng Wu wrote:
> > I mean that lift1.1 and lift2.0 may have the same futures,
> > But lift1.1 is for Scala2.7 and lift2.0 is for Scala2.8.
> > With Scala2.8 stable , the lift1.1 could not be enhanced.
> >
> > It's better than Lift2.0-Scala2.7 and Lift2.0-Scala2.8.
> >
> > And there're better explain why Lift2.0 and Lift1.1 if people ask what's
> > the different between Lift2.0 and Lift1.1?
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Randinn <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Why not with 2.8 just going to beta 2.0 my estimation is that 2.0
> will
> >     be finished before....
> >
> >     On Dec 21, 12:03 pm, Xuefeng Wu <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >      > Why not release Lift2.0 with Scala2.8?
> >      >
> >      > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> >      > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > > Okay Folks,
> >      >
> >      > > Lift 2.0 branch has shaped up enough for everybody to play with.
> >      > > Checkout the branch irc_wip_lift20 and get going! Just be aware
> >     that
> >      > > it's still undergoing updated and changes incrementally and
> >     there are
> >      > > few rough edges.
> >      >
> >      > > Key changes:
> >      >
> >      > > 1. The project tree has been restructured according to the
> proposal
> >      > > sent out earlier [1]. To summarize, we now have three top level
> >      > > projects (framework, archetypes and examples) each with
> independent
> >      > > build life-cycle. There are other additional infra projects
> >     that are
> >      > > less to do with the actual code.
> >      >
> >      > > A quick summary of the top-level projects:
> >      >
> >      > > 1. Framework:
> >      > > The whole of Lift Framework that matter most to most. The usual
> >      > > modules (viz., lift-base, lift-persistence and lift-modules)
> >     have got
> >      > > nested within. Therefore, from now on, building Lift framework
> >     would
> >      > > mean just that. Doing a "git pull" or "git clone" as usual,
> >     changing
> >      > > to framework directory and running "mvn install".
> >      >
> >      > > 2. Archetypes:
> >      > > The standard distributed archetypes. The archetypes help you
> >     get quick
> >      > > started with a Lift based project. If you are not into building
> >     maven
> >      > > archetypes, you can stay clear of this. But a quick probe is
> >     welcome.
> >      >
> >      > > 3. Examples:
> >      > > All the Lift examples are grouped into this project. If you are
> >      > > generally interested in learning different techniques from
> examples
> >      > > you don't have to build the whole of Lift anymore. Well that
> >     was still
> >      > > the case earlier, but now it's even more obvious. And it's true
> the
> >      > > other way round too, if you have to build Lift framework from
> >     source,
> >      > > you don't have to build the examples along with it. Another
> >     point: the
> >      > > examples won't be deployed on scala-tools maven repo anymore.
> Those
> >      > > war files up there serve no good purpose.
> >      >
> >      > > Everything now gets neatly tucked into their respective homes :)
> >      >
> >      > > Additional points that you should be aware of:
> >      >
> >      > > A. Availability on scala-tools repository:
> >      > > - Components of framework would be available
> >      > > - Components of archetypes would be available
> >      > > - Components of examples would *not* be available
> >      >
> >      > > B. Availability on scala-tools Maven site:
> >      > > Site generated from framework would be the main content of
> >     scala-tools
> >      > > Maven site. Depending on how things go, we might even have a
> >     home of
> >      > > it's own athttp://dev.liftweb.net <http://dev.liftweb.net>.
> >     (Separate proposal coming up)
> >      >
> >      > > C. Lift Parent Project Model:
> >      > > The top level pom.xml has moved to it's own home at
> >     resources/project-
> >      > > model. This would stay as a 'flyweight' project (as in boxing,
> not
> >      > > GoF) on it's own that would strictly control the common
> behavior,
> >      > > plugin dependencies, versions etc. for all the top level
> projects
> >      > > (framework, archetypes, examples). This would be deployed on
> scala-
> >      > > tools repository.
> >      >
> >      > > D. Lift Site Skin (WIP):
> >      > > I haven't started working on this yet. But the intent is to
> >     create a
> >      > > project site that is of some real value and serves as
> >     placeholder for
> >      > > mostly 'auto-generated' docs. See #B above.
> >      >
> >      > > E. Still pending:
> >      > > a. Migration to Scala 2.8 branch. Intend to have stable master
> >     created
> >      > > first with everything working as usual without being caught
> >     into Scala
> >      > > release cycle. Hopefully, this branch and '280_port' would
> >     merge soon!
> >      > > b. Higher quality site generation (See #B above, proposal
> >     coming up)
> >      > > c. Site skin (See #D above)
> >      > > d. Hudson integration and better release management. So that
> >     certain
> >      > > steps in Committer release process [2] become automatic
> >     (waiting for
> >      > > merge to master and hudson maintenance)
> >      > > e. Having a nice README.md at the top level
> >      > > f. General spit and polish
> >      >
> >      > > F: To be decided:
> >      > > a. Future of lift-core. (Separate mail coming)
> >      > > b. Relevance of OtherLicensedWorks.txt (repo distribution of
> >     javamail
> >      > > is now under CDDL and license automatically reflects in
> dependency
> >      > > page)
> >      > > c. Need for remove-trailings.sh (can be replaced by git
> pre-commit
> >      > > hook)
> >      >
> >      > > [1]
> >      >
> >      >
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/450a3e741...
> >      > > [2]http://wiki.github.com/dpp/liftweb/committer-release-process
> >      >
> >      > > Feedbacks most welcome!
> >      >
> >      > > Cheers, Indrajit
> >      >
> >      > > --
> >      >
> >      > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >     Google Groups
> >      > > "Lift" group.
> >      > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>.
> >      > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >      > > 
> > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> >     
> > <mailto:liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> ><liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> >     
> > <mailto:liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> >>
> >      > > .
> >      > > For more options, visit this group at
> >      > >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
> >      >
> >      > --
> >      > Scala中文社区: http://groups.google.com/group/scalacn
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >     Groups "Lift" group.
> >     To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>.
> >     To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >     
> > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> >     
> > <mailto:liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> >.
> >     For more options, visit this group at
> >     http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Scala中文社区: http://groups.google.com/group/scalacn
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Lift" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
>
>


-- 
Scala中文社区:  http://groups.google.com/group/scalacn

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


Reply via email to