On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Paul Sandoz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:22 PM, David Pollak wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Timothy Perrett 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Yes, if you constantly change containers, then there is value in
>> Atmosphere for that as it does leverage the native APIs for the container.
>> We [lift] are waiting for servlet 3.0 to standardise the comet API - whilst
>> its debatable if that will prove as an api standardisation solution, it
>> should level the playing field somewhat - right now the different containers
>> are all doing different things in different ways.
>>
>
> Marius is actively working on an abstraction of the thread dropping so that
> other containers that use different APIs can be plugged into Lift (or vice
> versa) because the Servlet 3.0 spec is taking forever.
>
>
> OK. Servlet 3.0 spec is now finalized, meaning there is at least one
> implementation (in GlassFish v3) but i guess it may take time for others to
> arrive.
>
> Are the async features of Servlet 3.0 sufficient for lift's requirements?
>

Yes and it will be supported by the work Marius is currently doing.


>
>
>
>
>>
>> Essentially lift uses special classes within Jetty (the continuation API)
>> to make comet scalable... there is nothing stopping comet working in other
>> containers with lift, the only restriction is that it does not use the
>> native container API so it's essentially thread based - to that end, if you
>> have a lot of connections things could get sticky.
>>
>> Lift has things that Atmosphere does not have (yet) like the multiplex
>> support, and object delta'ing... perhaps other comet frameworks will get
>> this in the future, but right now, using Jetty is not a deal breaker for
>> most of our users. I guess its only really an issue if you have a heavy
>> investment in something that is not jetty. However, I would stress that lift
>> is an excellent framework even if your not using comet and that would of
>> course deploy without any issues in any container.
>>
>
> As Tim points out, Lift has a number of advantages in its Comet support:
>
>    - Multiplexing -- you can have many Comet components on a given page
>    and they all talk over a single long poll.  You can see this at
>    http://demo.liftweb.com.  Both the clock and the chat component are
>    Comet.  Neither piece of code was special or required knowledge of the
>    other.
>    - Connection saturation detection -- Lift will avoid connection
>    saturation by only allowing a single long poll to be active at once.  If a
>    second connection (this is tunable and it's on my to-do list to make it
>    browser tunable as Chrome has more than 2 connections per server) is opened
>    from the browser, Lift will automatically terminate the long poll.
>    - DNS wildcard support -- To avoid the connection saturation issue, you
>    can have the long poll done on a DNS wildcarded server and tune the long
>    poll connection termination logic.  This allows many different browser tabs
>    to have open long polls.  The server name is automatically changed on each
>    page reload and the actual client-side and server-side components are
>    unchanged (that means the app developer doesn't have to worry about this
>    part of the plumbing.)
>
>
>
> I am not suggesting Atmosphere can or should be utilized as a replacement
> for the useful features you enumerate. I think the area where Atmosphere can
> provide value to lift is scalable async support for many Web/App servers.
>

To date, the large Lift comet users have been using Jetty with success.  If
there is demand for Lift's Comet support on non-Servlet 3.0 platforms, we'll
look into Atmosphere integration.

Thanks,

David


>
> Paul.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

Reply via email to