Pushed to rmm_wip_couch, in case anyone wants to take a look.

I made the tests skip if couchdb is not (apparently) running at 
http://127.0.0.1:5984, as suggested by Alex Boisvert, but didn't have time to 
make the record integration test yet.

-Ross

On Jan 13, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Ross Mellgren wrote:

> Hey all,
> 
> I've completed adding a record integration to the CouchDB module I mentioned 
> a couple weeks ago (though I have not yet written unit tests, so I don't know 
> it works) as well as field classes in lift-record for optional (nullable) 
> field values. I'm in the process of writing the tests for the record 
> integration and then I'm going to add multi-document fetch maybe.
> 
> However, I've run up against something I have a question about -- the unit 
> tests. Since the tests require CouchDB to be running, and I don't think the 
> Hudson machine nor many dev machines have that, I think the tests might have 
> to be disabled by default. Is that okay?
> 
> Also, I haven't looked yet, but if anyone knows some maven-fu off the top of 
> their heads to make that happen, where the tests have to be specifically 
> enabled with a property or something, let me know.
> 
> I'm going to push a version to a rmm_wip_ branch sometime tonight with 
> however far I get in, so people can take a look if they like.
> 
> -Ross

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.


Reply via email to