Oh, if anyone who's familiar with or has a vested interest in Record could take a look at the changes in this commit of my branch, I would greatly appreciate it:
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/commit/eba18cbc2fcb1207ede22f0b2234fb47914d1ad0 -Ross On Jan 14, 2010, at 1:28 AM, Ross Mellgren wrote: > Pushed to rmm_wip_couch, in case anyone wants to take a look. > > I made the tests skip if couchdb is not (apparently) running at > http://127.0.0.1:5984, as suggested by Alex Boisvert, but didn't have time to > make the record integration test yet. > > -Ross > > On Jan 13, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Ross Mellgren wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I've completed adding a record integration to the CouchDB module I mentioned >> a couple weeks ago (though I have not yet written unit tests, so I don't >> know it works) as well as field classes in lift-record for optional >> (nullable) field values. I'm in the process of writing the tests for the >> record integration and then I'm going to add multi-document fetch maybe. >> >> However, I've run up against something I have a question about -- the unit >> tests. Since the tests require CouchDB to be running, and I don't think the >> Hudson machine nor many dev machines have that, I think the tests might have >> to be disabled by default. Is that okay? >> >> Also, I haven't looked yet, but if anyone knows some maven-fu off the top of >> their heads to make that happen, where the tests have to be specifically >> enabled with a property or something, let me know. >> >> I'm going to push a version to a rmm_wip_ branch sometime tonight with >> however far I get in, so people can take a look if they like. >> >> -Ross >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
