Is there any way to get maven to decide? If there was some way to set JQuery as a dependency in the pom and have Lift locate it at runtime that may make the most sense, if such a thing is remotely possible. Indrajit, any comment?
------------------------------------- Jonathan Hoffman<[email protected]> wrote: I think that makes sense. How is this-- should we leave the default to 1.3.2 for now? object JQueryVersions extends Enumeration("1.3.2", "1.4.1") { val v132, v141 = Value } @volatile var jQueryVersion: JQueryVersions.Value = JQueryVersions.v132 On Jan 27, 2010, at 11:39 AM, David Pollak wrote: > Do we want to include both and have a switch in LiftRules or somesuch? > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Jonathan Hoffman <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi Indrajit, > > I think you're right. I didn't notice at first, but there are documented > breaking changes in jQuery 1.4 which are outlined here: > http://jquery14.com/day-01/jquery-14#backwards > > Marius, there's also a backward compatibility plugin(see above link) that > might address the jstree issues if you do want to use 1.4.1 > > - Jon > > On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote: > > > Hmm, I think this jQuery update should be sent as a separate announcement. > > As this change that can create create ripple in an application and > > qualifies as a 'potentially' breaking change. > > > > Cheers, Indrajit > > > > On 27/01/10 6:16 PM, Marius wrote: > >> This broke my app ... with flying colors :D > >> > >> But it's not really Lift or jquery's fault. I'm using jstree plugin > >> http://www.jstree.com/ and it doesn't seem to work properly with > >> jquery 1.4. > >> > >> No biggies as I reverted to jquery 1.3.2. but others may hit this as > >> well. > >> > >> Br's, > >> Marius > >> > >> On Jan 26, 9:03 pm, Jonathan Hoffman<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Has anyone done extensive lift testing withjQuery1.4.1? My very brief > >>> test seems to indicate that things still work as expected, but I'm not > >>> doing anything with comet. > >>> > >>> http://jquery14.com/day-01/jquery-14 > >>> > >>> Should lift 2.0 upgrade? > >>> > >>> - Jon > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Lift" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Surf the harmonics > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
