On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jonathan Hoffman <jonhoff...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I was able to find the root cause. jQuery 1.4.1 does not consider > javascript objects that contain functions to be be valid JSON. > According the to JSON spec, a function is not valid JSON. > > This is ok: {"foo":"bar"} > This is bad: {"foo":function(){alert('hello')} > > jquery-1.4.1.js:491 --> parseJSON > > jquery 1.3.2 simply eval'd strings to created json objects, so there was no > problem. I think it's kind of nice to be able to return JSON objects via > ajax calls with embedded functions, but please feel free to educate me if > you think that's a bad idea. > I think it's a nifty trick, but I'm not sure it's optimal. Is it a Lift thing or your app that's returning the function as part of the JSON response? > > I'll also try to get some feedback from the jQuery forum. > > Thanks, > > Jon > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Hoffman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > There is a problem with making jsonCalls which return JSON with anonymous > functions. I've created a very simple reproducible example, but have not > been able to track down the root cause. > > > > Take a look at jsonCallBug in: > http://github.com/hoffrocket/lift_1_1_sample/blob/master/src/main/scala/com/liftcode/snippet/Hello.scala > > > > The project should run in mvn or sbt. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jon > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.