On 14 February 2010 20:10, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Makes sense, and that was actually close to what I had initially: The > Logger trait was called LiftLogger, but this clashed with the current > LiftLogger. > > This name (Logger in current code) probably doesn't matter too much as > it's usually not needed in client code. But AbstractLogger doesn't > sound very nice :-) > Even if (probably) not needed, we should try to name it the best possible way. Changing now causes no pain at all, but later ... you know. Heiko Work: weiglewilczek.com Blog: heikoseeberger.name Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
