FWIW, I agree mostly completely, and when I was writing the integration I didn't like the fact that I couldn't make one model object usable for both Couch and an RDBMS (for example). I guess it could be made to support more than one if the persistence-specific stuff was untangled from MetaRecord/Record subclasses and made into mixable traits?
-Ross On Feb 15, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote: > Debasish just posted this: > > http://debasishg.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-i-dont-like-activerecord-for-domain.html > > Interesting feedback especially regarding the current design of > Record... > > Cheers, Tim > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
