My original goal with Record was to have something like:
class Person extends Record[Person] {
}
class CouchPerson extends Person with CouchDB[Person]
So the persistence mechanism is mixed into an abstract Record.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]>wrote:
> Debasish just posted this:
>
>
> http://debasishg.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-i-dont-like-activerecord-for-domain.html
>
> Interesting feedback especially regarding the current design of
> Record...
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
