Hah maybe if I have some extra moments I'll look at it. I'm preparing for a short trip this weekend so my spare time this week is short.
If you didn't have a book to write I'd make you do it! ;-) -Ross On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: > Ross my good man, did you just volunteer? :-D > > +1 on the MegaUberRobotTronFromOuterSpace. There is also a fair amount of > Java-ish code in there; it would be nice if that went away sometime too :-) > > Cheers, Tim > > On 23 Feb 2010, at 20:32, Ross Mellgren wrote: > >> Perhaps eventually (or if someone right now has a strong use), but maybe in >> the short term it should be just mildly split up a bit so that it can be >> used separate of MetaMegaTron? I'm sure there are plenty of people who just >> need authentication and have no intent of using more sophisticated LDAP >> integration. >> >> -Ross >> >> On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: >> >>> Seems like the current lift-ldap ought to be gutted and turned into a >>> pure LDAP wrapper for scala. Then we can add a record abstraction and >>> any other abstractions people want. >>> >>> Cheers, Tim >>> >>> On Feb 23, 8:07 pm, Ross Mellgren <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> It might turn out that we'll need an actual LDAP record backend at work, >>>> so I may write one in the future ;-) >>>> >>>> -Ross >>>> >>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Oh yeah, you are right Ross! >>>>> Doh... in that case, might have to do some refactoring on that module >>>>> to give it a more functional style. >>>> >>>>> Cheers, Tim >>>> >>>>> On Feb 23, 7:15 pm, Ross Mellgren <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> There's no record code in there -- it uses mapper in fact. >>>> >>>>>> I think this is just for auth. >>>> >>>>>> -Ross >>>> >>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>>>>> I see the LDAP has finally been committed... what is it doing in >>>>>>> modules? Its a read / write to LDAP based on record... shouldn't it be >>>>>>> in persistence? >>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, Tim >>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Lift" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group >>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. >>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "Lift" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Lift" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lift" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
