Good morning LL, and t-bast, > > Basically, if my memory and understanding are accurate, in the above, it is > > the *PTLC-offerrer* which provides an adaptor signature. > > That adaptor signature would be included in the `update_add_ptlc` message. > > Isn't it the case that all previous PTLC adaptor signatures need to be > re-sent for each update_add_ptlc message because the signatures would no > longer be valid once the commit tx changes. I think it's better to put it in > `commitment_signed` if possible. This is what is done with pre-signed HTLC > signatures at the moment anyway.
Agreed. This is also avoided by fast-forwards, BTW, simply because fast-forwards delay the change of the commitment tx. It is another reason to consider fast-forwards, too.... Regards, ZmnSCPxj _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
