I hereby cast my vote for number one, the static / Dynamic examples from
Lila.
Thanks, David B. P.S. Topic #3 looks very good too.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Diana McPartlin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 1999 5:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: LS CALL FOR VOTES May 99
>
> Hi Squad
>
> Here are the suggested topics for May 99. Could you please indicate
> which
> one you are voting for by replying to this message. Voting will be
> closed
> on April 30 at 24:00 GMT.
>
> rds
> Diana
>
>
> 1. With reference to the examples given in LILA, explain dynamic and
> static
> quality and the relationship between them.
>
> 2. Given the ideas that (a) when in moral doubt we should always
> choose the
> option that would allow for dynamics and (b) there are a virtually
> infinite
> number of outcomes for any situation--- how can we ever realistically
> speculate as to what option would be more Dynamic in any given
> situation?
>
> 3. Is Pirsig a philosopher first and Mystic second? Or is it the
> other way
> around? (or) Has Pirsig generated a philosophy with mystical elements?
> or
> is he a pure
> mystic whose "religion" sounds like [but isn't] philosophy.
>
> 4. Capture the essense of MoQ in 81 words, no more or less.
>
> 5. Is Dynamic Quality the best venue? When do we know and how or if,
> Dynamic
> Quality is or is not the way to choose? Give examples from the books
> ZMM and
> LILA and also from other sources. Other sources might include personal
> experiences which involve a choice. State the reason the choice was
> made. Was
> it a Dynamic or Static choice? Were you Right or were you Wrong? and
> explain
> WHY on MOQ terms.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
