Number 2
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason McKague [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 6:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LS CALL FOR VOTES May 99
VOTE
# 3
-----Original Message-----
From: Diana McPartlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 1999 8:50 PM
Subject: LS CALL FOR VOTES May 99
>Hi Squad
>
>Here are the suggested topics for May 99. Could you please indicate which
>one you are voting for by replying to this message. Voting will be closed
>on April 30 at 24:00 GMT.
>
>rds
>Diana
>
>
>1. With reference to the examples given in LILA, explain dynamic and static
>quality and the relationship between them.
>
>2. Given the ideas that (a) when in moral doubt we should always choose the
>option that would allow for dynamics and (b) there are a virtually infinite
>number of outcomes for any situation--- how can we ever realistically
>speculate as to what option would be more Dynamic in any given situation?
>
>3. Is Pirsig a philosopher first and Mystic second? Or is it the other way
>around? (or) Has Pirsig generated a philosophy with mystical elements? or
>is he a pure
>mystic whose "religion" sounds like [but isn't] philosophy.
>
>4. Capture the essense of MoQ in 81 words, no more or less.
>
>5. Is Dynamic Quality the best venue? When do we know and how or if,
Dynamic
>Quality is or is not the way to choose? Give examples from the books ZMM
and
>LILA and also from other sources. Other sources might include personal
>experiences which involve a choice. State the reason the choice was made.
Was
>it a Dynamic or Static choice? Were you Right or were you Wrong? and
explain
>WHY on MOQ terms.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
MOQ Online - http://www.moq.org
