Comment #4 on issue 3320 by [email protected]: Dynamic spanner vertical spacing
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3320

How much of the stuff in comment #3 is still relevant after improvements in pure heights and unpure-pure-containers? It seems like defining core sizes is no longer a problem and that extra space can be requested either via pure heights or Y-extents in general (without the minimum business). I'm fine with keeping minimum extents if the problems they solve can't be solved in other ways, but it may be worth it to scrap these properties if what we are expressing through them can be farmed out to other constructs.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

Reply via email to