Comment #4 on issue 3320 by [email protected]: Dynamic spanner vertical
spacing
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3320
How much of the stuff in comment #3 is still relevant after improvements in
pure heights and unpure-pure-containers? It seems like defining core sizes
is no longer a problem and that extra space can be requested either via
pure heights or Y-extents in general (without the minimum business). I'm
fine with keeping minimum extents if the problems they solve can't be
solved in other ways, but it may be worth it to scrap these properties if
what we are expressing through them can be farmed out to other constructs.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings