Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement

New issue 3752 by [email protected]: Repeat types coda, fine
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3752

Ok, I am annoyed that we don't have proper repeat types here. \repeat syntax will work fine for most purposes:

\repeat coda 2 { c d e f } \alternatives { { %{coda sign%} ... %{da capo/segno al coda%} } { %{actual coda%}... } }

\repeat fine 2 { c d e f} \alternatives { { %{fine sign%} ... %{da capo/segno al fine %} } { %{must be empty%} } }

That does not cover all possibilities of course, but it would work reasonably well with \unfoldRepeats out of the box, and one basically needs "just" to create proper typesetting, with strong suggestions of appropriate breakpoints and appropriate ornaments.

It's really embarrassing that we don't have anything like that.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

Reply via email to