Comment #7 on issue 4371 by [email protected]: examples need explicit
\relative c'' {} to copy and paste correctly
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4371
Part of the Graham Documentation Project was to make all the examples
consistently use \relative, where before there was a mix of relative and
absolute methods of indicating the octaves of pitches.
This consistency allowed use to hide the \relative c'' {} but I don't see
any other advantage to consistency. The user never needs to interpret
pitches himself, because LilyPond does that for him, so seeing pitches
entered in the opposite of his favorite method would not be a problem.
Between relative/absolute, people generally think relative is easier to
enter (because of fewer ') while absolute is easier to read (because any
given pitch gets a the same octave marks each time it appears). The
method that is easier to read would be more appropriate for the user
manuals.
If we adopt a shorthand for \transpose x x'' to reduce the number of '
marks, then we have an entry method that is both brief and easy to read.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
