I borrowed Stone's book from the library - probably sending another accidentals patch soon.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I've restructured the accidentals engraver, and added property > > autoReminders, automatically creating reminder accidentals. > > Please comment on the new structure of the engraver. > > Still needs lots of clean up - as I do not entirely understand the idea > > of the tie-break handling. - Afaics it handles tie breaks the same way > > as before. - > > > But I do not really see the idea - i.e. in the example > > added to test/ I do not understand why the 2nd note of measure 6 should > > get a sharp... > > Unless I'm mistaken, it says > > dis ~ | \break dis dis > > the effect of an accidental alteration is not carried into the next > measure by a tied note. You have to restate the accidental on the 2nd > note in the measure without the break. I agree that it looks a little > silly when the first note also has an accidental (due to the line > break), but technically it is correct, since the 2nd one is needed to > determine the pitch of the note. This is not true accourding to stone's book. On p. 55 (II pitch -> Accidentals -> E. Tied accidentals) this exact situation is handled - and according to Stone the accidental on the tied note (first note on the line) is enough - and the accidental doesn't need to be repeated on the 2nd note. Comments? -Rune _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
