> This is not true accourding to stone's book. > On p. 55 (II pitch -> Accidentals -> E. Tied accidentals) this exact > situation is handled - and according to Stone the accidental on the tied > note (first note on the line) is enough - and the accidental doesn't > need to be repeated on the 2nd note. > > Comments?
Sounds reasonable! /Mats _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
