Karl Berry writes: > It seems to me it would be better (= less requirements of info readers) > to simply include the .txt file without the cookie in this case, as used > to be done.
Yes, maybe that's better. > The best solution would be deprecate info docs without images, > > I'm not entirely sure what you mean, I meant only for the LilyPond docs: not supply a version of the docs without the images. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
