I'm afraid you underestimate the number of people who actually
compile LilyPond themselves and have to struggle with development
versions of other tools just to be able to build LilyPond.


Possibly.  We try our best to discourage people to do so.  I see no
reason whatsoever for a user to compile LilyPond.  There are fairly
recent development snapshots for Red Hat, Debian and even Cygwin
nowadays.

But, at the same time, you want to encourage people to submit documentation patches (and other patches) and it's certainly a big advantage if it's easy for them to build the documentation after a change to see what it looks like before they submit the patches.

/Mats


_______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to