Currently, define-grob-properties.scm is (almost) alphabetical by property. This makes it nice for avoiding the collisions that occur when two different grobs have a property with the same name, but makes it very difficult to see all the properties associated with a given grob.
Would it make sense to order the properties alphabetically by the grob to which the property applies? That is, should we have all fret-diagram properties adjacent to one another? I suppose that if a standard were developed such that the property names began with the grob name, there would be no conflict between alphabetically and grouped by grob name, but renaming all of the properties seems to me to be a low priority. I've just added the properties for fret-diagrams, and they're scattered throughout define-grob-properties.scm. I'd be happy to collect them in one section if it's preferred. Thanks for your input, Carl Sorensen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
