On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 13:16, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Our thoughts on this matter aren't entirely set in stone. Since you've > already added a lot of properties, we can't save precious development > time by not using properties :-) Maybe you could review all of them, > and prune the ones which are surely not user-serviceable. > I've done this in the CVS now. > > > Is the preferred method of using constants to define named constants, > > then use those named constants in the code? If so, should the named > > constants just be defined at the top of fret-diagrams.scm? > > Good question - there is no preferred method yet, but perhaps your > proposal is a good idea. > The way I resolved it is to just comment out the lines that used properties (makes it easier for future expansion) and just put in a line to assign the default value to the variable. It seemed like an easy way to preserve the property value if usage seemed to require it. Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
