Matthias Neeracher writes: > bash, although at the time I did this patch, it might have been zsh
I'm sure. It is a bug for any GNU software to impose arbitrary limits. > If I may ask conversely, what is there to be gained from using > $(foreach) ? It seems that the output produced by for is a little > bit more compact and readable, and the results are identical. The patch is fine; until we all run GNU it's impractical to ignore other broken softwares, if they can be so easily supported... Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
