[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > On 26-Feb-05, at 7:55 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > > > >> Engraved by LilyPond 2.5.x (http://lilypond.org) > >> > >> other ideas? > > > > Possibly www is better recognized than http://, ie: > > > > (www.lilypond.org) > > I'd say either both, or just www. > > Engraved by LilyPond 2.5.x (http://www.lilypond.org) > Engraved by LilyPond 2.5.x (www.lilypond.org)
then I'd vote for the first, as (www.lilypond.org) looks half-baken to me. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
