On 12-May-05, at 2:40 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:I favor this solution. Is this ok?Maybe one alternative is to skip the links to the music expressions (*Event) all together since they can be found by navigating Arpeggio -> Arpeggio_engraver -> arpeggio-event. This would also reduce the number of links that have to be kept up to date manually in the manual.
I guess the Event types can be ditched if somewhere it is explained clearly that you can do
\displayMusic ...
and see what's inside.
What's this? How is \displayMusic supposed to work?
I'm not sure whether removing the Grob name is a good idea. Thoughts?
No, I definitely won't remove Grob names.
The main proposal here is that instead of having this:
Arpeggios blah blah @seealso _ArpeggioEvent_, _Arpeggio_
we just have this:
Arpeggios blah blah @seealso _Arpgeggio_
If a user wants to see the internals stuff, he clicks on _Arpeggio_. The very first line tells
him that Arpeggio objects are created by Arpeggio_engraver and Span_arpeggio_engraver;
following those links will get him to arpeggio-event. We don't need a link to
arpeggio-event in the refman page about Arpeggios.
Cheers, - Graham
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
