Thomas Bushnell writes:
> Anyway, with my patch (or equivalently with yours, I'm sure), lilypond
> 2.6.3 is now in Debian. (Whew!)
That's great, thanks a lot for your efforts.
> I'm going to start going through the many Debian bug reports
That's a good thing too. Btw, have you checked the dependencies?
LilyPond no longer uses
ec-fonts-mftraced
I think the package
musixtex-fonts
does not exist and if it does, I cannot imagine any conflicts. Also,
as LilyPond does not use tex by default
libkpathsea3
tetex-bin
tetex-extra
are not requirement anymore. They may be useful, and are required
when using the (unsupported) TeX backend.
> Lilypond is such a great thing, I'm glad that finally Debian users
> will have an up-to-date package at least in Debian unstable.
Thanks! Yes, that's great. And don't forget the Ubuntu users.
> Oh, and a request: the debian/ directory in the tarballs that you all
> distribute isn't very helpful to me
I always liked to distribute this for users to build their own deb
package [from CVS]. What do you think?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel