On Friday 04 May 2007 14:30, Graham Percival wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > My gripe with it is that we're using the repository as a form of > > communication. I think you will get more useful input if you use email > > discussions for communication. If you position tolsr as dumping > > ground, that is what you will get: dumped stuff, i.e. garbage. > > Well, this is up to you and Joe (since you guys do 90% of the new > features). When you add a new feature to lilypond, in addition to > adding a regtest, please add a snippet that demonstrates the feature to > the appropriate subdir of input/tolsr/ . (this snippet might be an > exact copy of the regtest)
Thast sounds ok to me. Assuming I'm feeling energetic enough to write two separate examples, how should the LSR example compare to the regression test (ie. shorter/longer, explanatory comments, etc.)? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
