Joe Neeman wrote:
On Friday 04 May 2007 14:30, Graham Percival wrote:
Thast sounds ok to me. Assuming I'm feeling energetic enough to write two
separate examples, how should the LSR example compare to the regression test
(ie. shorter/longer, explanatory comments, etc.)?
Pretty much the same. Maybe add one or two 1-line comments, but that's
the only thing I would change. The only reason that we're not
automatically using all regtests is that 90% of the regtests are for bug
tests, not new features. As long as you add the remaining 10% to
input/tolsr/, I'm happy. :)
I wouldn't bother with a snippet for "engraving improvements", though.
For example, although the bug fix for #97 used new code (and thus
Han-Wen would call it a new feature), most users would call that a bug
fix. Ditto for the vertical collision stuff -- it's a fantastic
improvement for lilypond, but since users don't need to do anything
different (it applies to all scores), we don't need a new snippet in LSR.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
