2008/4/24 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The idea of a cross reference is to get me where I want directly. If it > is in the vicinity of interesting material, nice (hopefully everything > is interesting). But "it is good for you to wade through unrelated, > closely situated material" is nothing that I buy. If I want to, I'll > wade through, one time or other. But that should stay the reader's > choice.
Hi David, I'm afraid you misunderstood Graham here (as I did earlier). Snippets pages are absolutely NOT unrelated. Perhaps you know that LSR snippets are now tagged by theme, *but* also according to their relevance as documentation resources. In other words, on the "Pitches" snippets page, you will find *only* snippets that have been -tagged as "Pitches": i;e. they deal with a subject that is related to pitches definition and/or modification -but *also* tagged as "docs": that means these snippets have been considered interesting for the docs. Besides, as Graham pointed out, in the Notation Reference sections, we have the ability (and we do use it a lot) to quote specific snippets if these are really important. Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
